Posted 07 May 2010 - 09:53 AM
What weight leather do you prefer for mag pouches? The one shown below was built with 7-8 oz, with a 5-6 oz reinforcement.
Thoughts? Suggestions? Care to show pics of your preferred pouch style? Should I build a wooden dummy, glue it to a board, then mold the outer piece of leather to the wood block, then sew it to the backing so the back of the pouch is flat? Seems like a lot more work for a $30 item.
For some reason I always have problems with thread tension on the pouches - even if they are cut from the same hide, same section, and sewn immediately after a perfectly (meaning the tension was perfect) sewn matching gun holster.
(note that the reinforcement piece wasn't supposed to be darker - the first piece got messed up and I had to cut another one - when I dyed it, it was a couple hours after I dyed the rest of the mag pouch and I accidentally put on a heavier coat with the airbrush)
Posted 07 May 2010 - 10:27 AM
Posted 07 May 2010 - 11:39 AM
What are you applying to your edges by the way? And, do you always leave the interior undyed?
Edited by LeatherCaptain, 07 May 2010 - 11:41 AM.
Posted 08 May 2010 - 08:11 AM
Hello all - I decided to go ahead and add magazine pouches and belts to my offerings. While I'm not dissatisfied with my current pattern for a single mag pouch, I would like to see if anyone can offer suggestions on how to make it better. Last night I made a trial build of a double-mag pouch. It's the same style, just wider. By the time you allow a little space between the mags, the stitch lines, and the belt loops, the double pouch seems fairly wide to me. I debated moving the belt slots to the rear via folding the front over to the rear and letting that form the belt tunnel. I also debated making them bi-directional so the same pattern could work for left and right handed shooters.
Hi particle. Great work!! As to a double pouch, I went the way of a belt tunnel to decrease the overall width as well as making them bi-directional. I don't do many double mag pouches, but here is one I made not too long ago. Totally different style than yours but it works. Also mags can fit either way.......made them slightly loose for steel challenge matches. Mike
P.S. That's a rivet in the center...not a snap, and it's just for eye appeal as it serves no real purpose...the back is actually stitched down.
Edited by katsass, 08 May 2010 - 08:14 AM.
At my age I find that I can live without sex..........but not without my glasses.
Being old has an advantage.......nobody expects me to do anything in a hurry.
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:47 AM
Here is one for a G30 .45 mag HUGE, but he was happy. This is where I decided al of my mag carriers would have heavier leather on the back
Double snap with a snap loop on each side
and a belt loop with the loop behind the mag pouch.
One improvement I am going to make (at least I hope it is) is to use a heavier 8-9 oz leather on the back and 6-7 on the front. That way when I mold it the back should not give as much for the molding keeping the back flatter.
I also cant the front mag forward for easier access.
Posted 10 May 2010 - 09:24 PM
This would have numerous benefits. First, the higher magazine position would allow easier access to the mags because there is more to get your hands on. Next, the bottom of the mag holder would sit higher making it easier to conceal, so this model would work well even for the folks who bought your IWB holsters. Even if it did show below a cover garment, the smoother shape is less conspicuous and therefore less noticeable. Another added benefit is that the smoother shape is easier to cut out and edge, which saves you time and effort when building them.
Posted 11 May 2010 - 08:34 AM
|Topic||Forum||Started By||Stats||Last Post Info|
Which beveler for which thickness of leather?
Life lessons for my daughter
|All About Us and Off Topic||rawhide1||
Where to begin lol
|Purses, Wallets, Belts and Miscellaneous Pocket Items||MADMAX22||
Billy cook, made special for Hulling,
|Saddle Identification, Restoration & Repair||Curbstrap2||
Looking for a source
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users