Members paris3200 Posted January 19, 2008 Author Members Report Posted January 19, 2008 Today I tried again doing two things differently. First off I got some Packer Leather kangaroo lace from David Morgan instead of the lace I got from Tandy. The difference is like night and day. The Packer kangaroo lace is much softer, stronger and looks better than the lace I was previously using. I also changed from a 8mm core to a 4mm core. For those interested in the math c = 3.14 * 4mm. C = 12.56 mm or .4944 inches. The results improved greatly. No longer could the core be seen no matter which way I bent the end product. I guess I'll stick with the 4mm core for now. I've always enjoyed math so I'm intrigued as to why mathematically you have to use a much smaller core than the sum of the lace width in order to get good results. Jason Quote http://www.parisleatherworks.com
Members Alan Bell Posted January 19, 2008 Members Report Posted January 19, 2008 I think this is where things get a little interesting. The Dorrances did all their measurements in 32'nds. In an earlier post someone mentioned how when you lace is running at 45 deg. angles it actually takes a little more than 8 x 1/8" strings to cover 1" in circumference. So the Dorrances would make their 1/8" strings actually be 5 or 6/32". The other thing is to adjust for stretch during the braiding. When you braid tight you can actually stretch a 6/32" strand so much that it becomes a 1/8' strand! Sharon Paulin has a string maker set up with a micrometer type dial to set the width for strings and for beveling edges. Once you bevel one edge and try to reverse the lace and bevel the other edge it is hard to keep the rawhide in the right spot to take off an equal amount beause the prior beveled edge is now the brace that sets the width but it has been weakened a little so she can dial it in a 32 of an inch to compensate. However you do it you will have to find a way to keep your strings consistent, your knots consistent and tight and to over compensate. Also try and find a way to make each strand slightly wider than the "standard" or use more strings or a smaller core! Vaya con Dios, Alan Bell Ain't no rules; ain't no vows we can do it any how. Bob Marley - Jammin' Quote
Members bernie Posted January 22, 2008 Members Report Posted January 22, 2008 The easiest way to figure out how wide your strands should be to cover a core is to multiply the diameter of the core by 4.5 and divide that by the number of strands to get your strand width. You will find that your strands will have to cover approximately 1&1/2 times the circumferance of your core to get a good cover. Kind Regards Bernie http://www.em-brand-whips.com Quote Kind Regards Bernie From The Wild Western Tiers Of Tasmania Australia Where the women are strong The men good looking and the children all above average. (Garrison Keillor) http://www.em-brand-whips.com
Members rawhide1 Posted January 23, 2008 Members Report Posted January 23, 2008 Bernie I'll try this agian!! Welcome to the site it's nice to have ya!! I want to thank thank ya for the formula. I was just wondering why do ya use the dia. opposed to the circumferance and what does the 4.5 repersent. I'm sure these are silly questions but my math skills are behind my computer skills! I visted your web site and those are dang nice looking whips. Thanks Mike Quote
Members Hedge Posted March 20, 2008 Members Report Posted March 20, 2008 Paris, Just a comment about the differences in the Tandy and Packer lace. Never used Packer but have used Tandy. My bet is that the Packer lace is made from drum stuffed hides and Tandy's isn't. That's the better process and produces superior lace, IMHO. Gary Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.