Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Question:

Friend of mine has a singer 128 with so called bullet shuttle....I have a Singer 99K and some other Singers witht the standard rotating round shuttle.....these two systems seems to have been produced side by side for many years....we are now wondering what is the reason for that....?

Does the bullet style shuttle has any advantige to the rotating shuttle.....? Was it cheaper to produce or meant for more heavy dudty work??

Just a few thoughts from two Hobby sewing machine freaks...hahaha...

Thanks for the input!!

Jimbob

http://www.elfwood.com/~alien883

First it is just leather....then it is what-ever I can dream off...

  • Members
Posted

The main benefit of a vibrating shuttle over a rotary or oscillating is that it is less prone to tangling when run in reverse. This of course makes it perfect for treadle applications.

The Singer 15-1 was a round bobbin, long beak shuttle machine (as used later in the 17/18 series) and was released before the vibrating shuttle 27 and 28 series. The 27 is the full size machine and the 28 is the 3/4 size. The 127/128 are later versions which include auto tension release when the foot is lifted.

Singer were great at producing obsolete machines. The Model 48 is a classic example as it was a version of the German high arm transverse shuttle machine developed many years after this style was waning in popularity and already obsolete by two decades.

Question:

Friend of mine has a singer 128 with so called bullet shuttle....I have a Singer 99K and some other Singers witht the standard rotating round shuttle.....these two systems seems to have been produced side by side for many years....we are now wondering what is the reason for that....?

Does the bullet style shuttle has any advantige to the rotating shuttle.....? Was it cheaper to produce or meant for more heavy dudty work??

Just a few thoughts from two Hobby sewing machine freaks...hahaha...

Thanks for the input!!

Jimbob

Darren Brosowski

Posted

The first machines in the 1850's were all bullet shuttle until Wilson invented the rotary shuttle,which is faster & smoother running than then the bullet style,as to way Singer made them both I'd say that he felt that's all some people would buy since that's what they are used to & then some people are open to the lastest & greatest.

Singer ended up buying out Wison & refined his machine & that is how we know have the 111w ,144w & countless other models.

Bob Kovar
Toledo Industrial Sewing Machine Sales Ltd.
3631 Marine Rd
Toledo,Ohio 43609
1-866-362-7397

toledo-banner-2.jpg

Posted

Thanks guys for the history lesson,

Sewmun you certainly know your Singer History.

So this is the reason my Singer 144W- 305 has a “made in USA” and is of a much better quality than my Other Singer made in Scotland.

When you look at the difference in tolerance and precision on parts, it is hard to believe they come from the same company. Many companies produce there products in different countries, but the product is always made to the company spec’s. Here they are not.

Trox

Tor

Workshop machines: TSC 441 clone/Efka DC1550, Dürkopp-Adler 267-373/Efka DC1600, Pfaff 345-H3/Cobra 600W, Singer 29K-72, Sandt 8 Ton clicking machine, Alpha SM skiving unit, Fortuna 620 band knife splitting machine. Old Irons: Adler 5-27, Adler 30-15, Singer 236W-100

Posted

Trox,

Years ago we used to import 45K's & other machines from England & they seemed to be of good quality.Maybe some other models were made in lower quality factories?

Bob Kovar
Toledo Industrial Sewing Machine Sales Ltd.
3631 Marine Rd
Toledo,Ohio 43609
1-866-362-7397

toledo-banner-2.jpg

Posted

Hi Sewmun,

The machine I refer to is my 29K- 72. (Silver color)

I bought this machine cheap from a school for physically retarded people.

The machine has a 1450-rpm clutch motor with out reduction and a modern stand. It was almost new, no wear or signs of use.

However it would not turn freely, so I guessed it was full of old hardened grease. I oiled it with petroleum and run it on full speed for a while. It was a little better, but still it was too hard to turn.

So I took it apart and found the main pulley had small holes, for broken off pieces inside. It looked like some retard has used on full speed it without oil or grease when it was new. Instead of running it in on slow speed.

It looked like the holes were made of extreme heat. The rest of the machine looked like new, no damage or signs of wear inside. However, inside the body, there were big pits in the casting with missing material. Many faults from the casting process everywhere. Too much material in some places that should have been grinded off, too little other places.

The machine had a very tight fit, they maybe are?

The needle bar driving lever to name a few, had to be polished, it was made to big. Without the use polishing paste instead of oil, it is no way this part would be run in by it self.

When you look inside a German machine, you will see that the part is made with micrometer precision; this was made with precision of an inch.

It took me a lot of polishing to get the machine in running condition. I do not use it every day so it still is tight, with some years of wear it will be like my Adler 30, smooth.

(It maybe a luxury problem to have some extra material to wear off)

The 145W- 305 on the other hand, is a old used machine (grey color), but it has a precision of a German machine, no faults inside the body there.

When you open it, it is like a Swiss watch, bigger but the same looks and smell of quality.

I do not know maybe my 29K was made on a Monday or a Friday afternoon. It sure looks like it was made in a hurry.

Trox

Trox,

Years ago we used to import 45K's & other machines from England & they seemed to be of good quality.Maybe some other models were made in lower quality factories?

post-10237-005416800 1316071018_thumb.jp

post-10237-009039600 1316071129_thumb.jp

Tor

Workshop machines: TSC 441 clone/Efka DC1550, Dürkopp-Adler 267-373/Efka DC1600, Pfaff 345-H3/Cobra 600W, Singer 29K-72, Sandt 8 Ton clicking machine, Alpha SM skiving unit, Fortuna 620 band knife splitting machine. Old Irons: Adler 5-27, Adler 30-15, Singer 236W-100

  • Members
Posted

Hi Trox,

What is the serial number of the machine? Being silver I suspect it is late production from just before the Kilbowie factory closed and this could account for the poor quality.

Hi Sewmun,

The machine I refer to is my 29K- 72. (Silver color)

I bought this machine cheap from a school for physically retarded people.

The machine has a 1450-rpm clutch motor with out reduction and a modern stand. It was almost new, no wear or signs of use.

However it would not turn freely, so I guessed it was full of old hardened grease. I oiled it with petroleum and run it on full speed for a while. It was a little better, but still it was too hard to turn.

So I took it apart and found the main pulley had small holes, for broken off pieces inside. It looked like some retard has used on full speed it without oil or grease when it was new. Instead of running it in on slow speed.

It looked like the holes were made of extreme heat. The rest of the machine looked like new, no damage or signs of wear inside. However, inside the body, there were big pits in the casting with missing material. Many faults from the casting process everywhere. Too much material in some places that should have been grinded off, too little other places.

The machine had a very tight fit, they maybe are?

The needle bar driving lever to name a few, had to be polished, it was made to big. Without the use polishing paste instead of oil, it is no way this part would be run in by it self.

When you look inside a German machine, you will see that the part is made with micrometer precision; this was made with precision of an inch.

It took me a lot of polishing to get the machine in running condition. I do not use it every day so it still is tight, with some years of wear it will be like my Adler 30, smooth.

(It maybe a luxury problem to have some extra material to wear off)

The 145W- 305 on the other hand, is a old used machine (grey color), but it has a precision of a German machine, no faults inside the body there.

When you open it, it is like a Swiss watch, bigger but the same looks and smell of quality.

I do not know maybe my 29K was made on a Monday or a Friday afternoon. It sure looks like it was made in a hurry.

Trox

Darren Brosowski

Posted

Hi, It is FA329069 Thanks

Trox

Hi Trox,

What is the serial number of the machine? Being silver I suspect it is late production from just before the Kilbowie factory closed and this could account for the poor quality.

Tor

Workshop machines: TSC 441 clone/Efka DC1550, Dürkopp-Adler 267-373/Efka DC1600, Pfaff 345-H3/Cobra 600W, Singer 29K-72, Sandt 8 Ton clicking machine, Alpha SM skiving unit, Fortuna 620 band knife splitting machine. Old Irons: Adler 5-27, Adler 30-15, Singer 236W-100

Posted

Hi Darren, I see the FA series starts as early as 1935, but when it ends I do not know. From http://www.singerco.com/support/machine-serial-numbers

Trox

Tor

Workshop machines: TSC 441 clone/Efka DC1550, Dürkopp-Adler 267-373/Efka DC1600, Pfaff 345-H3/Cobra 600W, Singer 29K-72, Sandt 8 Ton clicking machine, Alpha SM skiving unit, Fortuna 620 band knife splitting machine. Old Irons: Adler 5-27, Adler 30-15, Singer 236W-100

  • 5 years later...
  • Members
Posted
On 9/11/2011 at 8:12 PM, Jimbob said:

Question:

Friend of mine has a singer 128 with so called bullet shuttle....I have a Singer 99K and some other Singers witht the standard rotating round shuttle.....these two systems seems to have been produced side by side for many years....we are now wondering what is the reason for that....?

Does the bullet style shuttle has any advantige to the rotating shuttle.....? Was it cheaper to produce or meant for more heavy dudty work??

Just a few thoughts from two Hobby sewing machine freaks...hahaha...

Thanks for the input!!

Jimbob

Jimbob, have you used the 128 with leather?  How does it sew, what weight of leather is it capable of sewing?  Thanks for any info you have!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...