Uwe Posted July 10, 2017 Report Posted July 10, 2017 I got motivated and connected my SewPro servo motor to my Singer 7 Class in a test setup, just to check speeds and take measurements for the real table. I'm planning to mount the motor to the top of the table, rather than cutting a slot and mounting it underneath. This mounting concept would also work if you want to have the machine just sitting on top of the table. Here's a video of my test setup - just for reference since you're looking at motor options. The real test will be sewing a thick stack of webbing, but speed control looks quite suitable and slow enough to me, even without a separate speed reducer pulley. Quote Uwe (pronounced "OOH-vuh" ) Links: Videos
Members GPaudler Posted July 10, 2017 Author Members Report Posted July 10, 2017 That's kind of what I had in mind. Your 7 looks like there's room to fit the electronics box underneath with the buttons and display facing forward (if sideways). My 120 won't allow that so my installation might not be so tidy. I should try it first without a speed reducer. Thanks, Gary Quote
Members SARK9 Posted July 11, 2017 Members Report Posted July 11, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, Uwe said: I'm planning to mount the motor to the top of the table, rather than cutting a slot and mounting it underneath. This mounting concept would also work if you want to have the machine just sitting on top of the table. I've been making up my tables with the "servo" mounted on the top rear of the table....where the "dead space" for big lamps and thread stands usually is. This is a bad picture of my "universal table" for various "domestic" sized machines, and I set up my 29B that way as soon as the box was opened. The price point is now attractive enough to kill off the pathetic "domestic" stock motors for good, in my hideout. And... Since we don't have to shoehorn in 45 incredibly awkward pounds of archaic, buzzing, *watermellon sized* motors anymore, the main reason for going underneath the table at all has sort of gone the way of the dodo, at least for the casual user. I doubt I'll ever slot a table for belts again. -DC Edited July 11, 2017 by SARK9 forgot pix Quote Machines: Juki LU-563, Consew 206-RB5, Singer 20U33, Pfaff 481, Mitsubishi CU-865-22, Consew 29B, Rebadged Juki LU-562, Mitsubishi LS2-180, Seiko SK-6, Juki LG-158-1
Members Chayse Posted July 11, 2017 Members Report Posted July 11, 2017 That looks like a beast! No wonder they wanted to get rid of it...just for the shear size of it. Congrats on the find...looks to be in good condition as well!! Quote
Members GPaudler Posted July 11, 2017 Author Members Report Posted July 11, 2017 Sark9 - You are absolutely right! Why struggle with the under-table convention? Thanks Chayse, I'll post images when I get it running. Quote
Members Amassis Posted January 23, 2022 Members Report Posted January 23, 2022 Tenho interesse em maquina de costura para conturar roda de polir , altura do calcador 40mm. Quote
Members shoepatcher Posted January 24, 2022 Members Report Posted January 24, 2022 Adler 120 Class. Hard to find them. Last i knew, a company in Germany that makes the 30 class shoepatchers for Adler was still making them.. Price was over $20,000.00US.\glenn glenn Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.