Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I'm not sure if the capacity is the same between the 167 and 169 but on my 169 I was able to go thru about 10mm 1st attempt without making any adjustments. This is thinner thread than I would use ant pretty sure the needle was larger than it should have been and still did it like nothing was there. 

FB_IMG_1668541479331.jpg

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Yep It's a very good machine. It's replacement, the 869 is even that much better.

glenn

Edited by shoepatcher
  • 1 year later...
  • Members
Posted

how good this machine is for more delicate work? i know that with 669 you can sew very fine stitches (thin thread/needle). but 269 is the predecessor of 869. do you think i can get good results with fine threads (tex 90) with this machine?

i have a typical 441 which is great for heavy duty work. as the next machine i am planning to buy a 669 but i found an 269 in a very good condition and half the price of 669 brand new. i was wondering if 269 would be a good complementary machine for typical 441 or they are in the same league.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...