Moderator bruce johnson Posted February 26, 2010 Moderator Report Posted February 26, 2010 Slick, I would have to agree with Bob's numbers now for most professional and semi-professional toolers using mauls. It seems like talking to some old guys, the sticks were pretty popular. I use mauls mostly like you describe with the rocking wrist, but will use one sort of like hammer on bigger stamps and punches. I have mauls in wieghts from 14 oz to 3#. To compare between two makers, I have 1 and 3 pounders from both Wayne Jueschke and Barry King. Wayne's have more weight to the head end and drop heavier.I have a 1# from Bearman, and his is between the other two guys balance wise. On the bigger block stamps I was using the 2# and having to put more oomph behind it and sometimes two hits per impression. Last fall I got a 3# from Barry, and it makes a big difference - less double striking and overall less fatiguing. I just got a 3# from Wayne last week and it falls even heavier. Which maul I choose depends on stamp size and shape, and how cased the leather is for the effect I want. As far as material, the rawhide wears and flakes. Barry and Ed use a white plastic material for the head. Barry grooves his and Ed doesn't. I have used the tar out of Barry's and the grooves wear flat. It doesn't seem to make much of a difference to me when they do. Wayne uses a tannish plastic for the heads on his. I have used his a ton too, and they don't seem to wear. You will hear guys tell you that you need to grind the shank on the off the rack stamps to have square edges on top for the maul head to "grab" the stamp. I have several Tandy and modified stamps I use and haven't squared them. I don't see any difference with them staying in my hand. Quote Bruce Johnson Malachi 4:2 "the windshield's bigger than the mirror, somewhere west of Laramie" - Dave Stamey Vintage Refurbished And Selected New Leather Tools For Sale - www.brucejohnsonleather.com
hidepounder Posted February 26, 2010 Report Posted February 26, 2010 (edited) Well, actually, I think Bob is kicking on Tandy more than they deserve. I'm not "kicking" Tandy at all, Slick. I'm giving them credit for popularizing the mallet, not inventing it! It's just my opinion based on personal observations in the early/mid sixties. You're certanly not denying that Tandy included little wooden mallets in their tool kits are you?. Tandy didn't sell mauls in those days, probably because they were too expensive for the hobbyist/crafter. If you wanted to upgrade you bought a rawhide mallet. And to the best of my knowledge they never promoted stamping sticks, either...if they did it wasn't for long. Saddlemakers and shops bought their supplies and tools from private concerns, not Tandy and that is where mauls were sold. I can tell you this...I will NEVER forget the ribbing I took the first time I showed up on the job as a tooler with a mallet! And it was always one of the first questions I was asked when applying for a tooling job...."whose swivel knife do you use?" and "do you use a maul or a mallet?" What's more, I doubt you will ever convince me that Al Stohlman or F.O. Baird in any way, ever represented the common working tooler of that day! Regardless, whether I'm right or wrong, my comment sure wasn't intended as criticism...sorry you took it that way. Bob Park Edited February 26, 2010 by hidepounder Quote
hidepounder Posted February 26, 2010 Report Posted February 26, 2010 A number of years ago a company asked me to go to Mexico as a consultant to help their saddle company improve the quality of their saddles. One of the things we did was take a number of nice new tooling mauls with poly heads. We gave them to each of the toolers. They were using 2"x2" oak sticks about 12" long for their stamping sticks. They called the tooling room the telegraph office 'cause when you went by there you could really hear the tap-tap-tap of the wood against their stamps. All 4 sides of these wooden sticks would be well worn with deep indentations on both ends until it was so worn they would toss it in the corner. There was a huge pile of these worn sticks in the corner. We thought they would be very happy with their new Hi-tech mauls. They used them for a few days, tossed 'em in the corner and went back to their oak sticks. What a great story! I can imagine your surprise when the mauls hit the pile, LOL! Quote
Members BustedThumb Posted March 2, 2010 Members Report Posted March 2, 2010 As a woodcarver of many years, mauls have a bigger strike area, you can turn it any which way and it'll still hit true, and while it's heavier, it's still easier on the wrist than a mallet or hammer. I generally always used a pretty heavy 2.5 -3 lb maul, letting the weight of it drive through the finer cuts, and having more than enough oomph to take out the big stuff. With leatherworking you probably need just as much hit control and the occasional need to open up and wail on something, and a maul can give you that. The mallets that come in those kits are probably only 8 oz or so, rawhide mallets maybe topping a pound. Even though it sounds like a lot to be lifting and dropping a 2-3 lb maul all day, but you'll need to swing a lot harder, twisting your wrist and arm more, to get the same force with a lighter mallet. Quote
Members CitizenKate Posted March 2, 2010 Members Report Posted March 2, 2010 I've used both, and prefer a maul. For me, it just works better, and is easier on my arm, because of its heavier weight and balance. Kate Quote
Members skipj Posted March 2, 2010 Members Report Posted March 2, 2010 I've had no luck using my maul. I seems to drive my stamps sideways when I use it. Perhaps I need to use it more but it's frustrating to use. If I try to stamp basket weave along a guide line, the stamp always seems to make it's impression off the line. I have assumed that this is caused by the maul hitting off center. Since the maul is tapered in one direction and curved in the other, it's hard to hit the stamp square. Obviously, I'm doing something wrong. I can't believe they would be so popular if everyone had so much trouble. SkipJ Quote
hidepounder Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 I've had no luck using my maul. I seems to drive my stamps sideways when I use it. Perhaps I need to use it more but it's frustrating to use. If I try to stamp basket weave along a guide line, the stamp always seems to make it's impression off the line. I have assumed that this is caused by the maul hitting off center. Since the maul is tapered in one direction and curved in the other, it's hard to hit the stamp square. Obviously, I'm doing something wrong. I can't believe they would be so popular if everyone had so much trouble. SkipJ Skip.....it sounds like maybe you aren't being consistant with your strike. Regardless, if you've given the maul a fair chance and it doesn't work for you don't think twice about going back to what you're comfortable with. I've heard several folks talk about modifying the ends of their tools but I've never found that necessary. What is important is that you use what gives you the most enjoyable and best result. Hope this helps.... Bobby Quote
Members skipj Posted March 2, 2010 Members Report Posted March 2, 2010 Skip.....it sounds like maybe you aren't being consistant with your strike. Regardless, if you've given the maul a fair chance and it doesn't work for you don't think twice about going back to what you're comfortable with. I've heard several folks talk about modifying the ends of their tools but I've never found that necessary. What is important is that you use what gives you the most enjoyable and best result. Hope this helps.... Bobby Thanks I hate to give up. Perhaps I can find what I'm doing wrong and share. I wonder if any one else has had trouble using a maul? SkipJ Quote
Contributing Member UKRay Posted March 2, 2010 Contributing Member Report Posted March 2, 2010 Thanks I hate to give up. Perhaps I can find what I'm doing wrong and share. I wonder if any one else has had trouble using a maul? SkipJ Skip, I had problems when I first invested in a maul because I wanted it to work like a rawhide mallet and it simply wouldn't do it. I felt sure that if I just kept on doing things the same way I would eventually beat it into submission... LOL What solved the problem for me was when I realised that the maul had nothing to do with mallets and was an evolution of the craft. It had to be learned as a new tool and not picked up and used like an old one. I spent three days solid, beating every bit of scrap leather in my bin until I had a feel for the thing. I still managed to screw up a few times - mostly miss-hitting a stamp - but now I couldn't go back to a mallet. In fact, I haven't touched a mallet since I taught myself how to use a maul. I worked with mallets for years, before I knew any better, but now I tend to regard them as hobbyists's tool. I'm not saying that amazing stuff is impossible with a mallet, but, when you teach yourself to use one, good leatherworking is a lot easier with a maul. Slick - I use one of the standard Tandy Mauls but would love to try one made by one of the great US makers someday. Maybe some of their finesse would come with it! Ray Quote "Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps" Ray Hatley www.barefootleather.co.uk
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.