Members jk215 Posted October 8, 2015 Members Report Posted October 8, 2015 92 maybe? Looking to achieve a similar style thickness. Quote http://shop.makesupply-leather.com - Custom and Stocked Acrylic Templates
Members CustomDoug Posted October 9, 2015 Members Report Posted October 9, 2015 My guess is 138. Doug C Quote Does Anyone Know Where the Love of God Goes When the Waves Turn Minutes to Hours?
Members leatherisfun Posted October 12, 2015 Members Report Posted October 12, 2015 That isn't 138, most likely 92 as the original poster suspected. 138 is thicker than that. Quote
Members CustomDoug Posted October 13, 2015 Members Report Posted October 13, 2015 You could be right, to me it looks chunkier than 92 though. Also it' not a dressy wallet, more of a 'denim culture' piece which would typically give the a nod to a thicker thread. Hard to tell from the picture honestly. Not sure if this helps the conversation but I did a quick search on something I sewed using 138 Eddington in natural. The stitch per inch is closer than the OP's wallet picture, but the thread diameter seems similar to me: Doug C Quote Does Anyone Know Where the Love of God Goes When the Waves Turn Minutes to Hours?
Members 25b Posted October 13, 2015 Members Report Posted October 13, 2015 Looks like 92 to me... Quote
Members 25b Posted October 27, 2015 Members Report Posted October 27, 2015 On 10/12/2015 at 2:53 AM, leatherisfun said: That isn't 138, most likely 92 as the original poster suspected. 138 is thicker than that. ^^^-------...what he said... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.