Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I just completed 2 Slim Jim holsters and gun belt ( no pics yet) and was just curious how hard (stiff) the holster should be for western style guns.

  • 1 year later...
  • Members
Posted

I'm sure there are others that know more than I , but I Always put a spine up the open side of all mine  That makes it three widths thick . Seems to make it less able to twist or bend . I don't use as heavy of leather than many do,  this from a  leather master from my past . He was of the belief that the saddle skirting he had seen was over kill . I also don't store my pistolas in the holster , but I do stuff some paper in them to hold their shape .  I use" Art" paper that has no acid in it so as not to create an issue later on . Living in AZ . I don't need to worry about a lot of humidity . Anyway what's what I know , I think ?

 Arley  AKA Sorcerer 1

  • Members
Posted (edited)

It depends if you are going for historical accuracy or a modern interpretation. Traditionally, California style holsters were medium weight, usually with no lining. If a lining was used, older holsters would probably have been lined with felt, and later versions buckskin. Most had a toe plug. There were not many leather stamping tools around when this style first appeared, so most carving was a low-relief style & not the modern Sheridan style of carving popular since the 20th century. They were not stiff holsters compared to nowadays, & I've never seen one that was lined with a 2-4 oz leather like modern replicas. They were cross-draw & made to secure the pistol; a fast draw was not the primary intent for a traditional California-style Slim Jim holster. Attached is a pic of a beautiful replication done by my friend & mentor Jack Stewart in Ash Fork, AZ. He is a master craftsman & my inspiration for improving my skills.

IMG_0957.JPG

Edited by VMTinajero
  • Members
Posted

Here is a California style holster I made about 21 years ago for an 1858 Remington New Army. This was my first holster carving in this style:

 

IMG_1113.png

IMG_1115.png

IMG_1114.png

Posted (edited)

One thing to consider also is we have no way of knowing exactly how firm the leather was they used, sure we have an idea but remember back then leather didnt come from only young beef stock all the time and the tanning used slightly different methods. Everything we have from that time period has been used weathered and who knows how it was oiled or taken care of. Nowhere near its original feel/stiffness. 

Still can only be so accurate basically just trying to get appearance and basic construction the same (if thats what your going for) like VMT was saying.

Edited by MADMAX22

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...