Dave4 Report post Posted October 23, 2017 Greetings all, Photo: 2 feed dogs of different lengths. What is the functional difference between the 2 lengths? Is the shorter length better for curves? Any other differences, such as intended for different fabrics, uses, etc? Thanks! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dave4 Report post Posted October 23, 2017 Photo - other dogs with more rows and bigger footprint. Compared to the dogs in the 1st post, what is the purpose or functional difference of the dogs in this 2nd post? Thanks! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrmCa Report post Posted October 23, 2017 I guess, 1 - binder 2 - stitcher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikesc Report post Posted October 23, 2017 Dogs in front of the needle make it easier to control the material when in reverse. Short dogs are better for curves. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dave4 Report post Posted October 24, 2017 Thanks for the replies. Searched around, confirmed it's mostly common sense: Smaller pitch for lighter work, longer pitch for heavier. Shorter row (tooth count) for lighter work and for curving. Longer row for heavier work and generally straighter stitching. More rows for heavier material, also helps with straight lines, therefore not as easy to turn. Singer 31 spawned a LOT of plate/dog combinations! Thx. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrmCa Report post Posted October 25, 2017 And the asymmetric feed dog for binding operation. With a matching presser foot. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
