Members Grey Drakkon Posted December 6, 2014 Members Report Posted December 6, 2014 I'd also be leery of a request to leave off a maker's mark, especially if you display it on a spot that isn't prominently displayed. Like Wyoming Slick, I've seen marks that were just gigantic and to me at least took away from the overall look of the piece, but if it was on the back or under a flap I can't see any reason to object to it. You might want to explain that you use your maker's mark to not only brand your particular work, but to identify it if for some reason it would need repair. I work at a frame shop, and we put a sticker on the back of each frame we make. If someone brings in a frame where the picture has come loose behind it and our sticker is on the back, we take it apart, fix it, and put it back together again for free since it was done at our place. If it has no sticker or was done elsewhere though, they're charged for labor and materials since it's not something we did that caused the piece to come loose. (of course this is only for pieces that have come loose on their own, falling off the wall or actual physical damage gets properly charged) When you explain that your mark is added insurance he may reconsider. Quote "Everyone with telekinesis, raise my hand!" -Repairman Jack
Members BDAZ Posted December 6, 2014 Members Report Posted December 6, 2014 I agree with Slick on ALL points. Hardly worth responding to Camino Ridge's inane comment though, I think the OP stated the mark isn't visible and is on the inside . With the potential liability issues with a holster, I wouldn't want my mark on it. Who knows if 3 owners from now, some guy blows his balls off...they'll come looking for the manufacturer to join in the legal fun. I too would welcome the reasoning behind the request. We could all learn something....or not. Cya! Bob Quote
Members jfdavis58 Posted December 6, 2014 Members Report Posted December 6, 2014 My opinion: my work, my mark. That's enough reason; there are other makers. Quote
Contributing Member TwinOaks Posted December 6, 2014 Contributing Member Report Posted December 6, 2014 If anyone is wondering what happened to this thread, there were two topics asking the same question, by the same author...and both have a lot of replies. So, they're merged into this ONE thread, so all the info is in one place. Quote Mike DeLoach Esse Quam Videri (Be rather than Seem) "Don't learn the tricks of the trade.....Learn the trade." "Teach what you know......Learn what you don't." LEATHER ARTISAN'S DIGITAL GUILD on Facebook.
Members Coho Posted December 7, 2014 Author Members Report Posted December 7, 2014 (edited) Like I said, 1" x1" on the back (at the top under the belt loop. Here is the holster Edited December 7, 2014 by Coho Quote FIVE Leather , Calgary AB
Members simontuntelder Posted December 7, 2014 Members Report Posted December 7, 2014 Would it hurt to do some OEM work? I don't mind doing it personally. But it's always an agreement when I do so. Money is money and your brand is hopefully the quality of your work and not your name (ie your makers mark) Quote
raysouth Posted December 8, 2014 Report Posted December 8, 2014 An interesting topic. After thinking about the issue and reading the opinions of members, I feel that all have some valid points. It comes down to, will I or will I not, make something for someone without my makers mark. This is an issue that must be decided, I feel, by the maker of the item and what they are willing to do. I am not amongst the master leatherworkers so for me the issue is not something I dwell upon when making a piece, either for myself or others. If I were in the marketplace, perhaps I would like to display my craft with my own mark. I have a variety of maker mark stamps in the shop but rarely use anymore. Most every company that wishes to make a name for itself, or sell good products, has a mark/logo somewhere on the item. A good way to tell us who made the product and if they confidant enough to display their logo as a way to represent their product. If we are pleased with the product purchased from the company, then we remember the logo and look for it in the future. On the other hand, if we are displeased, it has the opposite effect. Unbranded items also hit the shops on a regular basis and may simply read, made in China, Pakistan, India, Korea, Japan, Indonesia, etc, where I don't think a name or mark would be of benefit to any of us here. A mark is also a good way to express the pride in what we have made so it also has some psychological benefits for all of us. I love to see the creative marks of others and at times, I envy the creative talent that went into the idea. In a nutshell, it depends on the benefit received by the maker, by applying the mark to the item in question and if there is a willingness to forego for someone who may have a reason, good or not so good, for asking that the mark not be present on the piece. I, as many others, would be curious as to why it is being requested, if for no other reason than to decide if I wish to pursue the matter and make the requested item/s. A decision that can be made by only by the maker and great topic for discussion. Good luck and hope that it ends well. God Bless. Ray Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.