Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Alright, so I know this is a leather sewing forum, but every time I google a potential new sewing machine model number, I end up here, so I figured it'd be a good place to ask.

 

I've been sewing for a little bit on a singer 'heavy duty', I think I'm sort of getting to the limits of what the machine is capible of (in terms of material thickness/etc, not sewing skill or whatever, obviously). I'm going to be using mostly canvas (15-24oz) but also leather and other heavy materials to makes bags/wallets/etc. I think 99% of what I'm doing will only be a couple layers of medium-heavy canvas with the occasional seam or piece of heavier material. It would be nice if it could also handle thinner material for bag linings/etc but it seems like most of them don't have that broad of a range.

 

It seems like the Consew 206rb-5 is a pretty popular option, especially for the heavier end of what I'd like to do. I'm also looking at the sort of in between walking foot machines like the Juki 1181 and the Consew 205rb-1. I understand these are only top and bottom feed machines and don't have the needle feed that the 206 has but thought maybe they'd do better with thinner stuff and ok with thicker stuff? I saw that both of these machines have the automatic oil pump, which you should only use if you're sewing pretty fast? I think I'd be going pretty slowly most of the time, not because of material thickness or anything, just lack of sewing skill. Would it work to unthread the machine and run it at full speed for a bit before/after use or should it be pretty much all the time?

 

Any suggestions or other machines I should look at would be a huge help, thanks!!

  • Members
Posted (edited)

If you can only have one machine then a cylinder arm walking foot would be nice (the ubiquitous Pfaff 335 or clones comes to mind), but the 206RB-5 should suit nicely, particularly if you can fit a servo motor (it will give better slow speed control and be much easier to learn on than a clutch motor). As for the oiling, if you're going to be using it slowly then learn how to manually oil the various parts. It will also help you to understand the machine better.

Just curious, what is the "Singer heavy duty" that you have?

Edited by dikman

Machines wot I have - Singer 51W59; Singer 331K4; Seiko STH-8BLD; Pfaff 335; CB4500.

Chinese shoe patcher; Singer 201K (old hand crank)

  • Members
Posted
3 hours ago, mwpdx86 said:

I think 99% of what I'm doing will only be a couple layers of medium-heavy canvas with the occasional seam or piece of heavier material.

A compound walking-foot machine might be more essential than you have experienced so far. I sew mostly marine canvas and when sewing canvas, the number of layers can mount up quickly. Simply sewing a double-fold hem over a semi-flat felled seam is nine layers. Sewing a double-fold hem over a flat felled seam is 12 layers. Doulble-hems at a corner also result in nine-layers but can be mitigated to fewer layers by mitering the corner. Add some webbing, and layers and thickness can increase quickly.

Needle-feed also helps mitigate the tendency of lower-layers of material to feed faster than upper-layers with drop-feed machines.

  • Members
Posted
21 hours ago, dikman said:

If you can only have one machine then a cylinder arm walking foot would be nice (the ubiquitous Pfaff 335 or clones comes to mind), but the 206RB-5 should suit nicely, particularly if you can fit a servo motor (it will give better slow speed control and be much easier to learn on than a clutch motor). As for the oiling, if you're going to be using it slowly then learn how to manually oil the various parts. It will also help you to understand the machine better.

Just curious, what is the "Singer heavy duty" that you have?

Yeah, I was kind of leaning towards the 206, but wasn't sure if it was overkill for my purposes. Any machine I get would for sure have a servo motor before I'd be able to use it, judging by the videos on youtube. 

The cylinder arm machines look like they'd be great for a lot of what I want to do, but it seems like they're usually quite a bit more expensive. I've found an online dealer who has the top/bottom feed machines for just over 1000 and the 206 for just over 1300, w/ servo motor and shipping.  It seems like the cylinder arm ones usually start at about 2000.

  • Members
Posted

I reckon that a flatbed should let you do pretty well all that you want. As for overkill, it's always better to get a machine that is a bit more than what you think you'll need, within reason.

Machines wot I have - Singer 51W59; Singer 331K4; Seiko STH-8BLD; Pfaff 335; CB4500.

Chinese shoe patcher; Singer 201K (old hand crank)

  • Moderator
Posted
29 minutes ago, mwpdx86 said:

Yeah, I was kind of leaning towards the 206, but wasn't sure if it was overkill for my purposes. Any machine I get would for sure have a servo motor before I'd be able to use it, judging by the videos on youtube. 

The cylinder arm machines look like they'd be great for a lot of what I want to do, but it seems like they're usually quite a bit more expensive. I've found an online dealer who has the top/bottom feed machines for just over 1000 and the 206 for just over 1300, w/ servo motor and shipping.  It seems like the cylinder arm ones usually start at about 2000.

Toledo Industrial Sewing Machines, and presumably all other Consew dealers, sell a less expensive flat bed triple feed machine, labeled: Consew P1206RB. It has a forced feed oil pump system, which is a plus. But, it lacks the safety clutch mechanism the the 206 models have. It lists at just under a grand, US.

Posted IMHO, by Wiz

My current crop of sewing machines:

Cowboy CB4500, Singer 107w3, Singer 139w109, Singer 168G101, Singer 29k71, Singer 31-15, Singer 111w103, Singer 211G156, Adler 30-7 on power stand, Techsew 2700, Fortuna power skiver and a Pfaff 4 thread 2 needle serger.

  • Members
Posted

The canvas you mention is pretty heavy duty. If your folding it much in your bag project you might want a bit more than the 1181 in my opinion. 

I seen early you mention bag and wallet projects. So honestly if this is the project list a standard size cylinder arm is best. These can be had with a smaller table that is mounted to the cylinder, so making a flat bed yet again removeable for bag work. 

Lets face it we all will try to get anything done if need to with what we have. So i would look at the offerings in a 138 size thread and lower cylinder arm machine. If you think about it thread color can totally do a good job as a eye catcher. 

Good day there

Floyd

  • Members
Posted

That P1206RB that Wiz mentioned looks pretty good for the money, handles up to #207 thread and even includes a servo!

Machines wot I have - Singer 51W59; Singer 331K4; Seiko STH-8BLD; Pfaff 335; CB4500.

Chinese shoe patcher; Singer 201K (old hand crank)

  • Members
Posted (edited)
On 8/17/2017 at 7:18 PM, Wizcrafts said:

Toledo Industrial Sewing Machines, and presumably all other Consew dealers, sell a less expensive flat bed triple feed machine, labeled: Consew P1206RB. It has a forced feed oil pump system, which is a plus. But, it lacks the safety clutch mechanism the the 206 models have. It lists at just under a grand, US.

The p1206rb is another one I was looking at.  I wasn't sure about the safety clutch.  I don't know how likely it is that I'll throw out the timing (or trip the safety clutch on a machine that has one) with what I'm doing.  Does that normally just happen when you try to sew something too heavy or when the needle flexes and hits the plate (that's been happening a lot on my home machine)??  Are there other important differences between the 206rb5 and the p1206rb?  The price difference doesn't seem too important if the 206rb is significantly better for some reason. 

Edited by mwpdx86
  • Members
Posted
On 8/16/2017 at 9:12 PM, dikman said:

 

Just curious, what is the "Singer heavy duty" that you have?

It's the 4452/4432/whatever the Joann's one is.  It's basically a home machine that maybe goes a bit faster?  I'm assuming it's just geared a bit faster (and thus less torquey) but doesn't actually have a more powerful motor or anything, which I guess is sort of the opposite of what I want at the moment.  At the time, I mostly just wanted an upgrade from the "it's-good-because-it's-metal" goodwill specials I kept buying. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...