Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I've searched the forum and couldn't find much other than just live with the marks or handstitch. Both are not options for me. 

I'm sewing 12/13 oz english bridle leather from Weaver for belts. Great stuff. But the presser foot marks are killing me. I've been sewing wallets too. 4-5 oz veg tan. Some places are 4 layers thick, and I have marks.

I have the presser foot adjustment out as much as it will go. I haven't found much to help.

I did run across something for the cowboy 4500. They were having the same problem. Someone suggest they cut the spring down a bit to relieve some pressure from the spring. That has me thinking. It makes sense right? What are your thoughts?

 

Posted

You must not have looked super hard - the topic of presser feet leaving marks has been discussed ad nauseam in this forum.

It all comes down to pounds per square inch of foot pressure. To get below the p.s.i. level that leaves marks, you can either lower the spring pressure or increase the square inches on the feet.

The discussions generally boil down to this:

1. Use the lowest possible spring pressure that will still adequately hold the material (modifying the spring may be required.)

2. Use feet with the biggest possible smooth footprint that still allow you to see what you're sewing.

3. Use a big, smooth feed dog, or skip the feed dog entirely and use a throat plate with a needle feed slot.

 

 

  • Members
Posted

I'm sure every single topic has been discussed  ad nauseam in this forum. 

Thanks for your reply.

  • Contributing Member
Posted

 

 

  • Members
Posted
2 hours ago, aaron8771 said:

I'm sure every single topic has been discussed  ad nauseam in this forum. 

Thanks for your reply.

Not really, but some subjects come up quite regularly (and this is one of them). Generally, with a heavy duty machine it will be almost impossible to stop getting marks of some sort, it's the nature of the beast. Even light/medium duty machines will leave marks on veg-tan. If you try to minimise the marks by reducing tension/pressure settings then you soon reach a point where the leather won't feed properly or starts lifting as the needle comes up, which can then cause missed stitches etc.

Virtually every holster/belt that I've seen that has been made on a heavy-duty machine has had feed marks.

Posted

Is it possible to use the blanket foot set with the teeth ground down smooth on that job? I would hesitate before reducing the foot pressure spring too far as in my experience the small foot footprint is likely more the problem. On that sort of thickness you could run into the job lifting up with the needle if you reduce the pressure too much. Another alternative is to get a wider foot from kwokhing like in this pic of mine and grind the side bit off if you don't want that guide part of it. http://www.kwokhing.com/

It is right on the last page in their catalogue from memory.

First pic shows small contact area of the standard feet

DSC00991_resize.JPG

2nd pic shows the kwoking feet with about twice the amont of contact area

DSC01416_resize.JPG

The picture below shows most of the range but you can get a wider front foot for a bigger gap and that may be a better one to cut down.

kh441rg.jpg

You may find some thing more about these feet in this post I did awhile ago.

Brian

  • Members
Posted

Someone on the Cobra staff suggested using a single-foot setup and putting a strip of thin, dense cardboard under the path of the foot. The foot hits the cardboard and not the leather. Tried it once just to check it out, and it seemed to work pretty well. If you are sewing straight lines on belts, maybe you'd get the hang of it, though it was as fussy as it sounds first time out. 

I love bridle, but in my experience it marks easier than other leathers. When I was asking this same question about machine marks a couple of years ago, one piece of advice I got was to work with leathers that take the foot pressure without taking on a dent. We get attached to our materials, so that was hard to swallow. But I think there's a lot in it.

For me, it's about adaptations, tradeoffs, etc. For instance, although my machine stitches perfectly well, the stitch itself never looks half as good as a saddle stitch to my eye (and I try not to look at the backside stitch at all!). I remind myself of the massive time savings with machine stitching. Plus, precious few customers notice that particular detail and even fewer are willing to pay a fair price for saddle stitching. When it comes to the leather itself, using the machine has prompted me to experiment beyond the firm veg tans I hand-stitched and has opened up lots of new possibilities for high-quality work. Good luck. 

  • Members
Posted

Thank you for your comments. Soccerdad, I'm going to try the cardboard since I have a few belts I need to get done today.

Rockyaussie, I'm going to look into a wider foot also.

I do realize that eliminating the marks is probably impossible. I'm ok with that. The marks are a lot deeper with with the Weaver English Bridle Leather than they are w/ Hermann Oak. Weaver's is noticeably softer.

  • Moderator
Posted
47 minutes ago, aaron8771 said:

The marks are a lot deeper with with the Weaver English Bridle Leather than they are w/ Hermann Oak. Weaver's is noticeably softer.

Almost all of our belts are made of bridle leather. We just rub out foot marks and any other scratches or range marks with a modeling spoon, and sometimes even a teaspoon.

  • Members
Posted

Thanks Wiz, will try that on a piece of scrap I did.

Finished up my three belts using the cardboard method. No marks but was a very S-L-O-W process.

  • Members
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Wizcrafts said:

Almost all of our belts are made of bridle leather. We just rub out foot marks and any other scratches or range marks with a modeling spoon, and sometimes even a teaspoon.

I've taken classes from the pros and this is what they say that they all do.

Edited by howlback
  • Members
Posted
52 minutes ago, aaron8771 said:

Finished up my three belts using the cardboard method. No marks but was a very S-L-O-W process.

Just curious ... do you think that with practice you'd get to a reasonable speed? 

  • Members
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, soccerdad said:

Just curious ... do you think that with practice you'd get to a reasonable speed? 

I once heard Chris Andre say something along the lines of... 'I don't mind stitching at a slow speed on my machine because I still remember how long it takes to sew by hand.'

Edited by howlback
  • Members
Posted

I dont think so. Kinda fumbled though it. Keeping the belt next to the guide, keeping the needle out of the cardboard and keeping the cardboard under the foot is challenging. But..... I will keep doing it on my 12/13 oz english bridle until I figure out something better. But like I said, not one mark. Thanks for the tip 

Just now, howlback said:

I once heard Chris Andre say something along the lines of... 'I don't mind stitching at a slow speed on my machine because I still remember how long it took to sew by hand.'

So true

  • Members
Posted
4 minutes ago, howlback said:

I once heard Chris Andre say something along the lines of... 'I don't mind stitching at a slow speed on my machine because I still remember how long it takes to sew by hand.'

I'm an amateur so I hesitate to say much on the forums, but Andre's remark rings true for me. 

Posted

Stick the cardboard to the feet? just kidding......answer I think is just get wider feet under there.

  • Contributing Member
Posted

The fastest, easiest, most efficient way to not have marks is not to remove them, but to not make them in the first place.  Suit yourself, but I find a piece of 4 oz scrap length of your hand (or so) prevents marks (there are still marks, but they're in the scrap piece, not the project) :dunno:

Spreads the pressure, much like a wider foot ... 

  • Members
Posted
15 hours ago, aaron8771 said:

Thanks Wiz, will try that on a piece of scrap I did.

Finished up my three belts using the cardboard method. No marks but was a very S-L-O-W process.

Good to hear! Thank you for sharing your solution. Great forum here, love the helpful responses. 

  • Members
Posted

Great helpful responses......  Even though the topic has been discussed "at nauseum".

  • Members
Posted

I have the Cowboy 4500 as well.

When I tightened more than recommended (I believe normal is 3cm of sticking the turret from the machine) I got marks as well on softer dyed pig leather (4 oz). So if you screw out the black round adjuster a bit, the marks will not be present anymore.

NO NEED TO GRIND SOMETHING. I would never grind something on such a expensive machine.

  • Members
Posted

G'Day,

I do something similar to wizcrafts , I use a large ' D' ring or ' O ' ring to rub out the foot marks. I could adjust the foot pressure more than I have, but I don't know how far I can adjust it, and  I'm worried that the adjuster on the top of the machine will  pop out and end up making a hole in my roof .  :huh:

I'll stick with the ' D' ring . 

( my extra ' ad nauseum  ' response ) :) 

HS 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...