Members sbrownn Posted July 16 Members Report Posted July 16 Best solution is to buy a commonly available servo and double up the speed reducers if you need to. Quote
Members dikman Posted July 16 Members Report Posted July 16 (edited) 2 hours ago, sbrownn said: Best solution is to buy a commonly available servo and double up the speed reducers if you need to. I did that once - a snail was fast in comparison! An interesting experiment but not very practical. Bottom line here is the Kinedyne (Hightex) motor is doubtless a good motor but if I had one, which isn't likely given the cost, I would still fit a speed reducer. And I don't need all the other gimmicks fitted to it. Edited July 16 by dikman Quote Machines wot I have - Singer 51W59; Singer 331K4; Seiko STH-8BLD; Pfaff 335; CB4500. Chinese shoe patcher; Singer 201K (old hand crank)
AlZilla Posted July 16 Report Posted July 16 6 minutes ago, dikman said: I did that once - a snail was fast in comparison! An interesting experiment but not very practical. Of course, I had to run the numbers. A 30MM motor pulley, (2) 2:6 reducers and a 3.5" hand wheel gives a 1:31.5 reduction. 100 RPM becomes 3.2 at the hand wheel. 20 seconds per stitch! Quote “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire “Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms.” - Aristotle
Moderator Wizcrafts Posted July 16 Moderator Report Posted July 16 Despite all of the improvements made in electronic motors over the last almost 20 years, I can still feather a clutch motor so it barely turns over the machine, and hold it at a slow and steady speed. Yes, they are noisy and generate a bit of heat. But, they are like the Ever Ready Bunny: they just keep on going! If anybody reads this and is having trouble controlling a clutch motor, try backing off the big screw on the clutch housing. This adds a certain amount of slack movement before the disks engage. You can also tighten the coil spring that holds back the clutch lever. That keeps the lever up and away from engaging accidentally. Finally, you can smear a little grease on the internal cork disk that mashes into the main disks. The final adjustment is to replace a large motor pulley with a 2 inch pulley, or to add a 2:1 speed reducer. Quote Posted IMHO, by Wiz My current crop of sewing machines: Cowboy CB4500, Singer 107w3, Singer 139w109, Singer 168G101, Singer 29k71, Singer 31-15, Singer 111w103, Singer 211G156, Adler 30-7 on power stand, Techsew 2700, Fortuna power skiver and a Pfaff 4 thread 2 needle serger.
Moderator Wizcrafts Posted July 16 Moderator Report Posted July 16 1 minute ago, AlZilla said: Of course, I had to run the numbers. A 30MM motor pulley, (2) 2:6 reducers and a 3.5" hand wheel gives a 1:31.5 reduction. 100 RPM becomes 3.2 at the hand wheel. 20 seconds per stitch! I try to keep my minimum sewing speed to about 1 stitch per second, except on intricate turns and patches. I slow down to get the best needle placement, then speed up on straight-aways. Quote Posted IMHO, by Wiz My current crop of sewing machines: Cowboy CB4500, Singer 107w3, Singer 139w109, Singer 168G101, Singer 29k71, Singer 31-15, Singer 111w103, Singer 211G156, Adler 30-7 on power stand, Techsew 2700, Fortuna power skiver and a Pfaff 4 thread 2 needle serger.
Members GerryR Posted July 16 Members Report Posted July 16 In the system I have (AC-VFD), the motor is spec'd at 35-459 RPM, 10-90 Hz. That is the output from the 5:1 reducer (gearmotor). I have a 1-1/2" motor pulley going to a 7" drive pulley for another 4.67 reduction giving 7.5 RPM at the machine at 10 Hz (minimun specified operating frequency for the motor), which amounts to 0.125 revs.per second or 1 revolution every 8 seconds. But that is not the point. The point is that when I hit the pedal, and the motor starts to move, I am easily in the safe operating zone of the motor, 10 Hz minimum. It would be absurd to run the machine at 1 stitch every 8 seconds for any length of time. The idea is to keep the motor happy and stll be able to do some controlled slow stitching. Just my $.02 Quote
Members StitchDoc Posted July 21 Members Report Posted July 21 On 7/16/2025 at 7:05 PM, Wizcrafts said: Despite all of the improvements made in electronic motors over the last almost 20 years, I can still feather a clutch motor so it barely turns over the machine, and hold it at a slow and steady speed. Yes, they are noisy and generate a bit of heat. But, they are like the Ever Ready Bunny: they just keep on going! If anybody reads this and is having trouble controlling a clutch motor, try backing off the big screw on the clutch housing. This adds a certain amount of slack movement before the disks engage. You can also tighten the coil spring that holds back the clutch lever. That keeps the lever up and away from engaging accidentally. Finally, you can smear a little grease on the internal cork disk that mashes into the main disks. The final adjustment is to replace a large motor pulley with a 2 inch pulley, or to add a 2:1 speed reducer. Wizcrafts, would you be able to show me on the attached photos where the big screw on the clutch housing is as well as the coil spring that holds back the clutch lever? I'm not sure where they are. Thank you, Phil Quote
AlZilla Posted July 21 Report Posted July 21 9 hours ago, StitchDoc said: Wizcrafts, would you be able to show me on the attached photos where the big screw on the clutch housing is as well as the coil spring that holds back the clutch lever? I'm not sure where they are. Thank you, Phil I don't know what that's called exactly but it's not what people mean when they say "Clutch Motor". It accomplishes something similar I've got a couple of those and some clutch motors. A clutch motor has something akin to an automobile clutch built right into the end of the unit. Here's Alexander Dyer talking about clutch motors: Quote “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” - Voltaire “Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms.” - Aristotle
Members dikman Posted Monday at 11:00 PM Members Report Posted Monday at 11:00 PM Yep, that's not a "modern" clutch motor, which Wiz is likely referring to, it's what Singer fitted to their older industrial machines. It's a separate motor connected by a belt to a pulley stack with a clutch in it. Quote Machines wot I have - Singer 51W59; Singer 331K4; Seiko STH-8BLD; Pfaff 335; CB4500. Chinese shoe patcher; Singer 201K (old hand crank)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.