BLT Report post Posted April 11, 2020 I have been using Fiebing's Antique Finish and am accomplished using it. That said, I have experienced difficulty trying to duplicate the color from one project to the next. I suspect that the problem is definitely not the antique finish itself, but rather the tanning process used on the various hides that I have purchased. I buy my leather from a leather wholesaler in the garment district of Los Angeles. The hides are always in good condition with few range marks, brands, etc. Their appearance is always the same no matter where in the pile I happen to pull my piece from. I usually apply the medium brown color and have noticed differences in how the color comes out. Recently, I decided to make a belt for myself using better quality blank. So, I ordered a Herman Oak (HO) blank from a mid-western supplier, since the Herman Oak supplier here in California did not sell HO belt blanks. I prepared the blank (after carving and stamping) as usual: oiled it then applied TanKote as the resist. When I removed the excess antique, I immediately noticed that the color was a beautiful medium brown, which was even better looking when I applied TanKote. Today, I finished a very detailed carving/stamping project on a purse. I went through the same process and got a color that was totally unlike that of the HO belt. What the heck! Yes, it looks antique. Yes, it is very attractive. But, no it isn't the color that I'd hoped for. So, with that lengthy preamble: my question. Am I correct that the differences in color from one project to the next are due to the leather itself having been tanned using various tanning agents unique to the tannery? I know when I asked the wholesaler about the hides, they told me that they purchased from various places such as Brazil and other South American countries, presumably Mexico also. I would appreciate hearing opinions from others who perhaps have experiences like mine. It would be great to purchase HO hides but, frankly, my customers would not be willing to fork out the bucks to upgrade to HO. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LatigoAmigo Report post Posted April 11, 2020 20 minutes ago, BLT said: Am I correct that the differences in color from one project to the next are due to the leather itself having been tanned using various tanning agents unique to the tannery? In my experience, I have had differences in color on the same hide. Maybe not as significant as yours, but still different enough to notice. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rhale Report post Posted April 12, 2020 Different tanneries take antique and dye differently, if you want consistently I would suggest sticking with Herman Oak or Wickett and Craig you will find both take antique and dyes extremely well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
battlemunky Report post Posted April 12, 2020 I've had inconsistency among the same hide as well. If there is a guaranteed way, I don't know it. All you can really do is try and remain consistent in your method and control what you can on your end. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bayou Bengal Report post Posted April 15, 2020 In my experience, I’ve noticed that even sometimes a dye color differs on the same hide. Chemicals on top of chemicals. It’s kind of like a science experiment. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites