dikman Report post Posted February 19, 2019 This seemed like the logical place to put this, if not feel free to move it mods. Following on from kgg's post elsewhere, I made a horizontal spool holder. The tube is a bit thin-walled steel tube that I had, a short stub was turned down to fit in the end and then that was turned further to fit a bearing from my scrap bearing box. The bearing and stub axle were fitted using Loctite bearing retainer (so they won't fall off!). A piece of thick-walled pipe was turned down to be a snug fit over the bearing, a short bar welded to the back and a bolt welded to the bar. Figuring out how to attach it to something, so that it could be moved between machines, had me scratching my head for a bit. Then I found a couple of old steel bushings from an old lathe (I don't throw things out very often!) and the inside diameter was a perfect fit over two of the existing thread supports. One was machined and drilled, cut in half and then one half tapped. A couple of screws with their heads cut off and wing nuts loctited to them gave me the clamping screws. A short bar welded to the tapped half finished off the mounting. I just need to cut a couple of rubber washers to locate either side of the spool to keep it in place and that's it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trash treasure Report post Posted February 19, 2019 I like that ! I have an old Pfaff 130, with a horizontal spool holder, and it always seemed more logical to have the thread unwind that way, without twisting. I may just have to engineer something like that for the shop machines Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kgg Report post Posted February 19, 2019 A really nice job, excellent refinement over my method. It is sturdy, basic, portable and functional. Did you find you had to adjust the top thread tension any or was there really no additional thread tension introduced? This is what I think the forum is really about having a question / problem, finding / offering a solution and then the refinement of that solution. In this case the: Problem: Thread going underneath thread spool / tangling particularly for 8 oz black bonded nylon thread and portability. Solution: Put the spool horizontally which is a more natural unwinding position as the thread spool was filled horizontally during the manufacturing process. Placing the spool horizontally does remove the counter clockwise thread twisting action as the thread unravels from the spool which in turn would reduce / eliminate thread springiness or spring back. kgg Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dikman Report post Posted February 19, 2019 I haven't tried it yet, but there's very little tension when just pulling thread off by hand. If the spool is heavy enough then the bearing rotates, if the spool is smaller/lighter with less weight and doesn't turn the bearing then it just rotates around the tube, still with very little tension. I don't think I will have to compensate much, if at all, for increased thread tension. tt, feel free to use the idea, no patents involved. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RockyAussie Report post Posted February 19, 2019 Should be able to print something like that ......re the rubber washers you may need smooth leather backing to reduce friction where it touches. With gold embossing foil on the automatic feed they often use a spring as well to set the friction just lightly. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dikman Report post Posted February 20, 2019 There ya go! Another 3D printer project for you! As for the rubber washers rubbing, as long as the tube is rotating, courtesy of the bearing, then the rubber rotates with it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RockyAussie Report post Posted February 20, 2019 Tempting except that I don't have any problems with the thread curling around and such. Possibly if I could do a multi revolver or something along that line might be of interest. A bit along the revolving bobbin holder and revolving from the centre on its side? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dikman Report post Posted February 20, 2019 That could work, for those that might swap between multiple spools - but it would be a rather large construction! Better off designing a simple single spool unit so the user could make several and fit one to each machine? 3D printing one would certainly be easier than my effort, which took a couple of days and a lot of work (and sweat, it still gets warm in my sheds at the moment). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chrisash Report post Posted February 21, 2019 Knocked this up on Fusion 360 as a idea, either screwed to table base or g-clamp, with maybe 6mm steel rod with bolts either end to hang loose, about 220 mm width of base, easy to change thread and weight of thread should stop it pulling out Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RockyAussie Report post Posted February 22, 2019 9 hours ago, chrisash said: Knocked this up on Fusion 360 as a idea, either screwed to table base or g-clamp, with maybe 6mm steel rod with bolts either end to hang loose, about 220 mm width of base, easy to change thread and weight of thread should stop it pulling out The drawing is excellent and idea is good. There would be some trouble though perhaps printing in the air where it curls over. You could do it with a lot of supports but better if you can design it out. Just the holes would be OK and sliding the rod through perhaps? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chrisash Report post Posted February 22, 2019 I had assumed that supports "ON" in the slicer would overcome the overhang, myself i have not come across the thread twist problem , so just a idea and not much use to me apart from improving my understanding of fusion Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dikman Report post Posted February 22, 2019 My experience recently in printing model parts is that it's best to avoid using supports as much as possible. I lost detail on virtually every part that used supports and it created a lot of work filling and sanding the affected parts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rockoboy Report post Posted February 24, 2019 (edited) On 2/22/2019 at 11:02 AM, RockyAussie said: You could do it with a lot of supports but better if you can design it out. What about printing this stand in 3 components that clip together? There's your problem "engineered out". Edited February 24, 2019 by Rockoboy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RockyAussie Report post Posted February 24, 2019 4 hours ago, Rockoboy said: What about printing this stand in 3 components that clip together? There's your problem "engineered out". I have to admit that getting a design that prints out easily on the is something that I have yet to master and get right every time. Separating into components is often the best solution. Tip - Super glue works well on pla. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dikman Report post Posted February 24, 2019 I recently printed and made a model of the Liberator from Blakes 7 (something I've wanted for a very long time), it's a complex shape but the designer had separated it into components that when printed didn't require supports, and provision was made to use pins to join components. That is how any 3D printed design should be done and yes, superglue (and epoxy) work well on PLA. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chrisash Report post Posted February 24, 2019 (edited) From my small knowledge so far, the difference in size can be a problem with shrinkage for larger models I thought i would make a simple sample size spool of the filaments and used a central tube of 50mm with a thread on the end plus a nut the same size 50mm, (typical of the centres of most spools) When i printed both parts out the measurement between the outside of the tube thread was 48.8mm and the inside thread diameter was 46.2mm, both using the same PLA Whilst you can scale up/down a sample , doing things 2 or 3 times is a bit of a pain, and the shrinkage does not appear to be something you can make a graph of to eliminate the problem very accurately, though still learning and new to printing , i guess others may have found a solution or used better filaments Edited February 24, 2019 by chrisash Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wizcrafts Report post Posted February 24, 2019 For any members reading these last replies about 3D printing and are curious about them, we have a forum section dealing with 3D Printers and Laser Cutters. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites