Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, kgg said:

" Remember buy once, cry once."

kgg

 I believe this to be sound philosophy. Its also the logic behind the brand new cb4500 I drove 20+ hrs rnd trip to aquire just a couple weeks ago but them tears I'm only crying once haven't quite stopped flowing yet, so I'ma have to save up a bit for a new machine but in the meantime I ain't giving up on finding my used unicorn out there ... somewhere. 

 As always, I appreciate the feedback. 

Roger. 

 

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted
2 hours ago, Rodzhobyz said:

These industrial sewing machines are for me, a prime example of "the more I learn the less I know". 

The bobbin size is an issue I keep forgetting to consider. So much really doesn't make practical since to me. I knew many of the old patchers are very limited by their bobbin capacity, but why on Earth, most of 100 years down the assembly lines, would engineers design a high production, nearly immortal industrial Sewing machine and then handicap it over some 0.02 sq in of real estate inside the machine?

I can't imagine the additional costs of the larger bobbins having anything to do with restricting the bobbin size on a production model and I sure wouldn't think there's any advantage in having to stop & change them more frequently, but, Im sure there is perfectly logical reasoning behind it that shows off my complete ignorance. 

I am just thankful for you all who pitch in to help get an old green horn where he's trying to go. 

Cheers, Roger. 

A patcher is by design for footwear patches, which will always be small repairs and not need lots of stitching, they also need to be as small in area to fit inside boots etc, a bit of a tradeoff , small is beautiful in a patcher, thread length a minor concern

Mi omputer is ot ood at speeling , it's not me

  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, kgg said:

why not make a road trip to a Juki dealer

Nick-O-Sew is a Juki dealer and is in Tennessee

Posted IMHO, by Wiz

My current crop of sewing machines:

Cowboy CB4500, Singer 107w3, Singer 139w109, Singer 168G101, Singer 29k71, Singer 31-15, Singer 111w103, Singer 211G156, Adler 30-7 on power stand, Techsew 2700, Fortuna power skiver and a Pfaff 4 thread 2 needle serger.

Posted
2 hours ago, chrisash said:

A patcher is by design for footwear patches, which will always be small repairs and not need lots of stitching, they also need to be as small in area to fit inside boots etc, a bit of a tradeoff , small is beautiful in a patcher, thread length a minor concern

Sure, I can totally get why a shoe Patcher doesn't need a large bobbin, my point was actually trying to understand why a more modern industrial production machine like the 226 wouldn't benefit from having higher capacity bobbins such as the 206. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Wizcrafts said:

Nick-O-Sew is a Juki dealer and is in Tennessee

Yes sir, and thats only 30 miles from me.  I met Nick when searching for a cylinder arm machine. I met with him after hrs & was all set to load up a nice looking used Juki 341, when I made a bird's nest out of the bobbin / hook, locked it up and released the safety clutch while test sewing. 

 Nick's mechanics had gone for the day & at the time neither of us knew for sure what had happened to cause the break down so he said I could come back the next business day & it'd be fixed. Knowing nothing about the machine at the time, I got all worried about its condition, then found some threads by customers with unfortunate experiences and got all together spooked from used equipment & ended up trading with CowboyBob for a new model.  

  The more I think about it, knowing what I know now, that machine only did what it was designed to do, save itself from an idiot, I am actually tempted to just go back and buy that same or similar machine for my light weight sewing. I've found the machines less complicated than I had anticipated and it's awfully hard to justify the cost of another brand  new machine for my purposes. 

Something to think about anyway. 

  • Members
Posted

Your reasoning makes sense. I doubt if there was anything wrong with the machine or they wouldn't have allowed you to test it. Simply operator error, we all suffer from that at some point. If the machine suits what you need it for, and the price is right, then it's worth considering because you will have support close by, although as you become more familiar with it you would probably be able to resolve minor issues yourself.

Machines wot I have - Singer 51W59; Singer 331K4; Seiko STH-8BLD; Pfaff 335; CB4500.

Chinese shoe patcher; Singer 201K (old hand crank)

  • Moderator
Posted

Did you know about holding back the starting threads when you tested the Juki? Failure to do so virtually  guarantees a birds nest.

Posted IMHO, by Wiz

My current crop of sewing machines:

Cowboy CB4500, Singer 107w3, Singer 139w109, Singer 168G101, Singer 29k71, Singer 31-15, Singer 111w103, Singer 211G156, Adler 30-7 on power stand, Techsew 2700, Fortuna power skiver and a Pfaff 4 thread 2 needle serger.

Posted
57 minutes ago, Wizcrafts said:

Did you know about holding back the starting threads when you tested the Juki? Failure to do so virtually  guarantees a birds nest.

 That was probably the one single thing I did know to do at that time. It sewed really nice for a couple mins, but it was actually the first sewing I'd ever done on any cylinder arm & I was randomly pressing the reverse lever, sometimes while sewing pretty fast & all of a sudden it began making a clicking noise and no more stitching. I am certain now that it was total user error. There was a nice wad of tangled thread left jambed around the hook. We cleared it but noticed the hook position had changed & assumed it'd jumped time ect.  Neither of us knew how simple it would've been to reset. 

  • Moderator
Posted

Singer invented the safety clutch to counteract operator errors while they were sewing under pressure and at speed. The simple act of reversing the handwheel at the wrong point in the cycle, or slightly too far, can cause the top thread to get tangled in the shuttle (ask how I know).

Posted IMHO, by Wiz

My current crop of sewing machines:

Cowboy CB4500, Singer 107w3, Singer 139w109, Singer 168G101, Singer 29k71, Singer 31-15, Singer 111w103, Singer 211G156, Adler 30-7 on power stand, Techsew 2700, Fortuna power skiver and a Pfaff 4 thread 2 needle serger.

Posted
16 hours ago, Wizcrafts said:

Singer invented the safety clutch to counteract operator errors while they were sewing under pressure and at speed. The simple act of reversing the handwheel at the wrong point in the cycle, or slightly too far, can cause the top thread to get tangled in the shuttle (ask how I know).

 After that fiasco, I did a lot of web searching / reading about that failure symptom and soon learned about the safety clutch feature. And wasn't ever sure but ended up convincing myself that the very situation you describe about a badly timed reverse must've somehow been how I fouled things up while test Sewing. 

 Knowing the big machine I ended up with, for lack of a more proper terminology, is not quite as "idiot proof", and would have no clutch system to counter poor operator technique, I was awfully timid about even using reverse until I understood how and why thread slack can become an issue by changing sewing direction unless the needle has passed bdc.  

  It's amazing how much simpler things are when you start to understand them. 

Cheers, Roger

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...