Jump to content

dikman

Members
  • Content Count

    4,088
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dikman

  1. Yeah, I read the same thing about using aluminium, but I'm a bit curious (besides, I like turning ally on the lathe, it's real nice stuff to work with). My grinder-mounted burnisher is running at twice the speed (2850 rpm) but it actually does a good job at burnishing. It will be interesting to see which one does the better job.
  2. You inspired me, bikermutt, so here ya go! The motor came with one of the sewing machines I bought - the WSV77, the head unit was fine but it had a home-made table, which I junked, and had this motor (1/4 HP, 1425 rpm, made in Canada and it's old!). I stripped the motor and found it had bushings, not bearings, but there was no slop in it so I oiled it up and away it went. A simple wooden mount so that it's portable and can be clamped to a bench/table along with a switch on the end. The burnisher is a made from a Blackwood tree that I cut down a few years ago, I had turned a few cylindrical pieces and put them aside to dry. This one had the least amount of splitting!! The motor shaft is 1/2" (so I can't use the burnishers that I made for my grinder) with a hole through it so I drilled the burnisher to fit the shaft and then drilled a crosshole and screwed a metalthread screw through the shaft hole and tapped into the wood. I'm also tempted to make a burnisher from aluminium, just to see how it would work. Maybe later, once I've cast a suitable cylinder.
  3. Sticks, I doubt very much if a high-end fashion house is going to be very interested in a beautiful row of saddle stitches. It's doubtful if their customers would know the difference between a saddle stitch and a machine stitch anyway (or even care), so I don't think it's a valid comparison. Besides, I think we all know that much of the high end stuff is churned out of the same factories as the budget stuff, so little difference in the type of stitching (=machine). As for learning to stitch, like JLS I got the books, watched some youtube vids and away I went. It's not that hard once you understand the mechanics of it but like most things does require some practice. The main reason for using machines is one of economics - if it's your livelihood then it's all about getting a return for your time and hand stitching can make that almost impossible. I just made a couple of small knife sheaths and a couple of cartridge-loop strips (for Cowboy Action stuff). Because they are smallish items I chose to hand stitch but this was my choice and there's no way I can charge the guy for the extra time, but because it's just a hobby for me that doesn't matter. In my opinion the hand stitching looks much better anyway (and he'll no doubt show them to others so I want them looking good).
  4. They're generally considered a pretty good machine for leather, no reverse stitching but that's no big deal. If it doesn't have a servo motor my suggestion is to fit one, it will tame the beast and make it much more enjoyable to use. If you don't have a manual/parts list they're available for download if you google them.
  5. Now that sounds like a better deal!
  6. I agree with your reasoning. Given the relatively high asking price for the used machines (and if they are too high then they won't sell) and the new cost (which, in the US, is quite reasonable) then I reckon a new Cowboy or equivalent is the way to go.
  7. Looks like the equivalent to a Pfaff 335. Very useful machine, but not for holsters. I'm not up with US pricing on used machines, but I agree it seems pretty high. I'm guessing that it's been re-painted as there are no obvious Singer markings on it. Another thought, if they don't know the model number how can they do a proper service on it? Bit hard when you don't have a service manual for it.
  8. I think Uwe modded a servo control setup to use a remote pedal, basically a mechanical mod. As TT said it would be a major job to try and get one of those domestic foot controls working with a servo. Like most things, anything is possible IF you throw enough money at it, but personally I wouldn't even consider it. Plus you'd certainly void any warranty by trying it. If you're good at DIY then it shouldn't be hard to make a suitable mechanical pedal control, however if DIY is not your thing then I'm afraid you're stuck with the normal pedal setup.
  9. Zapee, thanks for asking this question. While I haven't had any problems with this happening (yet?) I hadn't realised how crucial the two thread guides are. I learned a lot from the answers in this post!
  10. Yeah, most sewing machine pulleys tend to be 15mm. I had to sleeve one for a reducer I made so it shouldn't be too much of a problem. I drilled and tapped the pulley to take a couple of set screws 'cos I couldn't use the keyway to lock it in place.
  11. I stand corrected then, Hockeymender. Mine goes into meltdown if I use a speed reducer . I have read of others having the same problem, but if yours works then it must depend on the servo brand?
  12. My first servo came with a needle positioner, mainly 'cos it seemed like a good idea at the time! I set it up, tried it and didn't really like it. In fact, I found with a servo set up to sew slowly I don't need the positioner. Also, be aware that a needle positioner won't work if a speed reducer is fitted.
  13. The smallest pulleys I've seen are 45 mm (that's what I use). I'd fit the smallest pulley I could to the motor, regardless of whether or not a reducer is fitted.
  14. You made the same mistake I did at first reading - it's 200 spm, not rpm, which equals about 3 rpm. Quoting spm, however, is meaningless as it all depends on the size of the pulley fitted to the motor and the size of the handwheel pulley. If it's a misprint, and is supposed to be rpm, then it's not a very good motor as a digitally controlled servo should be able to get much lower than 200 rpm. Really need the manual to work out what they really mean.
  15. Exactly which model servo are you looking at? My servos can be set to much slower than 200 rpm.
  16. Tut tut, I saw a couple of paint runs! Seriously, a great job there, I reckon you can feel proud to have resurrected it.
  17. Any of them could work, I guess, but some would require considerable modification/fabrication to do the job. Forget 24v motors as sourcing a suitable power supply would be an issue. At the end of the day a servo that's designed for the job and simply bolts in place is hard to beat.
  18. TT, you'd probably blow every breaker in the neighbourhood when that monster was turned on! Gigi, that sounds simple enough.
  19. Could be a bit tricky to implement, Sticks, but worth trying as basically all it will cost you is time. If it works then fine, if not you (we) will have learned a bit more.
  20. TT has a good point about proffering information that could cause problems for someone who doesn't really understand the subject. If you already have a 3-phase motor on your sewing machine then a suitable VFD (particularly if the price is right) could be a viable solution to speed control. However, as Gigi has pointed out, there are problems making speed adjustments on-the-fly unless you have three hands! It will need work to enable speed control via a foot pedal. If you have a conventional (single-phase) clutch motor then a servo is the only way to go. Fitting a VFD/3-phase setup will be costlier and require additional work, whereas swapping to a servo is a straightforward changeover process. Gigi also mentioned changing her clutch motor to a "normal" motor, but again unless you can pick up a suitable 3-phase motor cheap (unless you have one lying around) then it would be much simpler to just fit a servo.
  21. The 4500 S. E. - "True American style" they say........ I'm a little surprised that the 341 can handle 1/2" of leather but only up to #138 thread, otherwise seems like a nice enough machine.
  22. I will have to disagree with you on this one, Sticks. My first machine had a clutch (of course) which scared the daylights out of me the first time I used it!! I made a larger handwheel pulley and made a speed reducer (modified a couple of times) in an attempt to control this beast, all to no avail. Yes, they slowed it down some, but I still had issues, and without fitting a gearbox(!) had reached the limit of a mechanical solution. After reading about servos here (and finally figuring out what they were talking about) I bought one from Aliexpress, Chinese company, of course but with a warehouse here in Australia. Cost was $250 Aus, about $220 US. Best thing I bought, in fact I bought two more! No problems so far, and the control it gives me is awesome. There is no way I would spend $1000 on a servo, not for my needs (and I'm pretty sure many will agree, it's a bit over-the-top for a hobbyist).
  23. Yeah, I can see where that can be a problem (I'm sort of rural but close to the city, so almost the best of both worlds - almost). I forgot to comment on Mr. Gibson's excellent blog, much truth in there.
  24. I'm with you, Big Sioux. I love music and when I'm casting boolits I'll play some nice easygoing instrumental/orchestral stuff but when I'm working with the leather - nothing. It's too distracting because I listen to the music, rather than concentrating on what I'm doing (and as you know, one mistake can ruin a project!).
  25. Pfaff are nice machines, but be aware parts can be expensive.
×
×
  • Create New...