Jump to content

hidepounder

Contributing Member
  • Content Count

    1,808
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hidepounder

  1. Wow Barry....really nice site! Glad it's up and working! Looking forward to visiting at Wickenburg. Bob
  2. Mike...that's beautiful work! Really nice! Bob
  3. I need to let everyone know that I posted on some erroneous information. Paul has informed me that he can make his knives and blades interchangeable with those with round shanks, if desired. I was unaware of that option. My apologies, Bob
  4. In my opinion, the Henleys are by far the best bang for the buck! The machining is excellent and the yokes are mounted in good bearings. After several years of use, the yokes on all my Henleys will still spin freely for over a minute, just like my custom made Beards. Hide crafter used to sell Henley knock offs. They look exactly like the Henley but they don't have the same quality bearings in the yokes. I have several of these because they were $30 or $40 a piece and felt exactly like the Henley. I put my less frequently used, specialty blades in them. I don't know how the bearings hold up under everyday use, but would bet they last as long or longer than any of the AS knives. Bob Beards (Pro Series) standard knife goes for somewhere around $100, as do Chuck Smith knives, and are on an equal par with Beards and about the same price. Both are high end and excellent! I don't use Chucks because the knurling is very fine...I prefer aggresive knurling on the barrel, which allows me to roll the knife out to my fingertips and still hang on to it. I love Barry's tools but am not a fan of his knives. I don't care for the Stohlmans either, especially with the leather barrel...way too slippery for me. I agree with Randy...highly overrated! The Osbornes are basically the same as Tandy's. I have never used any of Pauls knives (Leather Wrangler). They are all aluminum and everyone I know who has one really likes it! I've never heard anything negative, except that they are expensive. However, round shanked blades won't fit in his barrels, nor will his blades fit in a standard barrel. That won't work for me! The swivelknives I use everyday are Bob Beards, which I had him make for me, and Henleys. I use Beards blades because they are extremely hard and stay sharp! I have been told that the ceramic blades are very good, however, if you chip one it's history. I don't have any problem sharping my blades, so I see no advantage with the ceramic. I highly recommend spending the money on a quality swivelknife and blade. Cutting is like the foundation of your house...not a good place to save money! Your knife cuts have more direct impact on the finished product than any other single tool you'll own. As you progress you'll find yourself needing more than one knife...and different widths for different cutting requirements. I agree with Randy, about trying the various brands out at a show, getting them in your hands, see what fits...most are adjustable...some are not, and there are a lot lengths, widths and styles to choose from.
  5. Bautiful Dave.....really classy the way they match! Bob
  6. Boy Denise...you just said a mouthful! You're so right! If you stood three Quarter horses together, a cowhorse, a showmanship horse and a halter horse...the only similarity you could find between them would be the breed registry on their papers! Kind of sad too..... Bob
  7. Just stopped by for coffee...sorry I missed you!

    Bob

  8. Vey nice Pete! Clean and elegant! Perfect example of how less is more! Bob
  9. Beautiful work David! I love your stuff! One of these days I'm going to figure out how to incorporate some tat art like you do, into some of my floral tooling. I'm always impressed with how clean your work is! Mine always looks "overhandled"....it probably is! Keep it coming...want to see more! Bob
  10. I sand on a stationary belt sander also....really works great. I get feathering at the edges, but that is removed when I edge. I've found that I get better final finish by allowing the speed of the belt to produce a slight scorch to the edge while sanding. I would like to try the spindle sander...but can you elimimate the oscillating feature? Sounds like a great way to finish edges.....you could wrap a sanding tube with saddle soaped canvas and you could add a wood slicker as well. Has anybody tried this? Does anybody know if the oscillation can be turned off? Here is an edge finished mechanically with soaped canvas. Bob
  11. I'm surprised to see that no one is using a head knife! I dampen the leather, make a strong mark with a stylus, and then cut freehand with a headknife. I've found that I can cut within a pencil mark. I used to use a straight edge and utility knife, but inevitably, something would slip resulting in disaster. The width of a head knife is such that there is so much blade in the cut, that cutting straight is almost easier than a cutting a curve! It goes without saying that your knife must be very sharp! Using a head knife seemed awkward at first, but I assumed there was a reason why all the pro's used them. Now I know! If I need two pieces to match identically...I cut the first piece, then use it as a template to cut the second piece. This is usually adequate. But if not, I wait for them to dry, then I use blue 3M tape to hold them together and I sand the edges to a "finish" line on a stationary belt sander. This is what I do, hope it helpful to you..... Bob
  12. Thanks Marlon! I can see it, now that Peter explained it. The clue is that the "false" billet end is not stitched. He amazes me! BTW, I have one of the modelers...it's about the only modeler I use... Bob
  13. Thanks leather1214, I trace the center line so that the main cuts are all fairly uniform in size...the rest of the cuts are freehand. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks Josh! They're not masterpieces, but I appreciate you saying so! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks Troy, I really appreciate your comments. I wanted a flower that kind of fit the Sheridan mold that didn't take so long to cut. Flower center is Barry's. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks Nick, The background is done with a set of Barry Kings #25 bargrounders. Bob
  14. Here's a couple belts I just finished. They are tooled on 7-8 oz HO leather, split to approx 5 oz, then lined with 5-6 oz HO. I used Fiebings Cordovan spirit dye and Fiebings Lt Brown antique, then finished with Neat-Lac. They are sewn with Rice #99 white thread at 9 stitches per inch. The lining is finger carved and finished with Tan-Kote. I designed the three piece buckle set and had it made by Red Bluff Buckles is NM. As always, all comments and critiques ae welcome! Bob
  15. Thanks for showing those to us Marlon....as usual, another "over the top" product by Peter! I have a question.....is the billet lining overlaid on top of the tooled lining to form an edge that can be burnished? I'm interested in how Peter constructed these..... Bob
  16. I like and use hardwood slickers...but take a look at my edges on the "legal size pad folio" and see what you think...they're done with canvas! I woudn't put too much stock certain types of wood having more impact in the final result. I think it's the process that matters. Bob
  17. Wow Troy! Just beautiful! You are amazing! I slick with glass before I start tooling also....wouldn't consider NOT slicking, now! I also use Barry's glass slicker...one of the best buys I ever made. I cross slick in all directions. Not only does slicking smooth out some of the inconsistencies in the surface of the grain...the process slightly compresses the leather resulting in cleaner, crisper tooling. An I agree...it helps make dying and coloring more consistant. I say YES to slicking....my final answer! Bob
  18. Thank you both David and Tina! More to come! Bob
  19. Thanks David & Bree.....I appreciate your comments! Bob
  20. Very nicely done Bobocat! Great composition, beautifully executed! Bob
  21. Bobocat, You're a gracious speaker and a Master tooler! I can't wait to see more of you're work. It's very inspiring to me and the others who recoganize your talent! Bob
  22. This has been a facinating discussion to watch and I just can't restrain myself from making a few comments...maybe from a slightly different perspective. First, let me state that I am not a saddlemaker! Worked in a couple shops, seen some saddles made, decorated a few of them. So I have a basic understanding of building a saddle. Secondly, I am not a novice in the saddle, gathered cattle in some pretty grueling country on our Arizona desert ranch, roped since the age of ten...still do, forty plus years later, even managed to make AQHA's top ten on a few occassions the past few years. I'm no expert, but do have a basic understanding of being in the saddle! All that said, I am exasperated with this discussion of fitting a saddle to a horse. Just what does that mean? Are you going to fit him when he's standing...or when his back's rolled handling a steer....or in a sliding stop? It doesn't equate for me....that's three different trees! Oh...and are we going to fit him when he's a little heavy from non-use, or after he's been ridden hard for a couple weeks? Here's something I know for a fact! The horse I start out on in the morning is not always the same size when I put him up in the evening. So how are we going to get this tree to fit this horse? The answer is simple.....we're not! And because of this, I just don't see the real value of applying highly technical equipment to "fit" an ever changing dynamic! It's kinda like saying you expect to wear the same size pants your entire life. It's just not a reasonable expectation, nor a practical one! I read an article that Dusty Johnson wrote a year or so back that I really like. Dusty quoted someone who said, "the saddle is both the central and the stabilizing force wedged between two very flexible and changing objects" and then Dusty said, "To consider the saddle as having primary control over fit versus the ever changing rider is simply absurd." He's dead right! So, what I need is a saddle that provides the least amount of discomfort to my horse and myself, while enhancing our ablity to complete the task at hand. And so we don't fit the horse...we fit the type! It is also interesting that the most concern about "fit" is expressed by those with the least experience. I think this is because experienced horsemen and saddle/tree makers don't expect one saddle to fit everything, and recognize the impracticality of having a saddle for every horse. Referring again to Dusty's article, and I know this to be true from my personal experience, that most successful horse trainers ride three or four saddles on fifteen to twenty horses, during every single session! Because they're saddles fit the types. There is something else I've noticed over the years, and I invite you to dispute this. The most complaints about fit come from those who purchase the cheapest thing they can find! It's especially true in the roping community...those of you who are familiar with this bunch, and it's a fraternity to which I belong, are nodding and laughing! What I'm sneaking up to is, that the quality of the product we put on our horses back, matters! It makes a difference! . Not every saddle/tree maker is necessarily good at what they do. So, if you want a better product, you have to belly up to the bar and get it from those who can provide it! It's not rocket science...quality takes time, time is money! And yes, if you're really committed to only using the best on your horses back, you'll have to find a decent used saddle to ride for a year or two until the custom one gets here! And it's gonna cost you! Cadilacs cost more than Chevys! Carbon Fiber? Sure, why not? Show me the advantages...but forget the tire test! And no more talk about fit...I'm not interested in seeing comparisons which have no practical application. Show me the benefits of carbon fiber when utilized as the "central and stabilizing force wedged between two very flexible and changing objects" and I'll sign on. Until then I'm sticking with the tried and true...because I'm a coward at heart and I'm just too old to become a pioneer......... (pioneers get arrows)! Okay!!! All done!!! "that's all I have to say about that!" (except....thanks for the opportunity to spout off!) Bob
  23. Art, I get the Journal and not Shop Talk...do you get both? I'm curious about how they compare... Bob
  24. Bob, Question: Do you slick by hand or use power slickers and the like? Marlon, Here's my process: I edge, wet the edge, liberally apply Fiebings bar saddlesoap to the edge, mechinically slick with heavy canvas sparingly impregnated with Fiebings paste soap (approx 1750 rpm). Next, I hand slick with a rub stick and then dye the edges, making sure I get good penetration and full coverage (spirit dye). When the dye is dry, I wipe off the residue (re-dye anything I'm not ahppy with), slick again mechanically with parafin coated canvas (1750 rpm), remove the residue with a cloth, polish with a clean, dry soft cloth. And there you have it! I will say, however, that this process is continually evolving as I learn new tips and discover new products and methods. Hope this helps.... Bob
×
×
  • Create New...